When it comes to solving the climate crisis, innovation often takes center stage. Big ideas like capturing carbon from the air to power planes dominate the conversation, presenting us with a hopeful narrative that we can save the planet without fundamentally altering the way we live. But here’s the question I keep coming back to: Is this relentless push for groundbreaking technology steering us toward real solutions, or are we simply trying to bypass the hard truths about our consumption and behavior?

Innovation has always been humanity’s strong suit. From the industrial revolution to the digital age, we’ve continuously reinvented the way we live and work. But in the context of climate change, our obsession with innovation might come with blind spots. The story often goes like this: a bold, revolutionary idea emerges, raises millions in investment, and promises to solve our biggest environmental challenges. It’s exciting. It feels hopeful. But when we strip away the hype, how often do these ideas address the root causes of the problem?

Take energy, for example. Most of us agree that transitioning away from fossil fuels is critical. But are we equally focused on reducing our overall energy consumption? Could the key to sustainability be less about producing unlimited green energy and more about learning to live within the limits of what the planet can sustainably provide? The concept of “enough” rarely gets as much airtime as “more.”

This isn’t to downplay the value of innovation; it’s crucial. Breakthroughs in renewable energy, battery storage, and efficiency technologies have already made a huge impact. But I wonder if we’ve grown too reliant on innovation as a catch-all solution, to the point where it becomes an excuse to avoid difficult but necessary changes. Why turn off lights when we could just install solar panels? Why rethink global supply chains when we can engineer carbon-neutral fuel?

At the heart of this dilemma lies a cultural narrative: progress means growth, and growth means more. More energy, more resources, more technology. But what if progress looked different? What if it meant rethinking growth altogether? Could we redefine success as living better with less?

I think back to some of the most powerful climate solutions that have emerged, not the shiny, headline-grabbing ones, but the simple, grounded changes in how people live. Local food systems, public transportation, energy-efficient housing—these don’t make waves like carbon-capture planes, but their potential to create meaningful change is undeniable. They require a different kind of innovation: one that’s less about technological breakthroughs and more about reshaping systems and mindsets.

Of course, this shift in thinking isn’t easy. It means asking tough questions: What do we really need? What are we willing to give up? And perhaps the hardest one of all: what if the future isn’t about fixing the way we live today, but about learning to live differently tomorrow?

These aren’t questions that can be answered by a single startup, summit, or policy. They require all of us, businesses, governments, and individuals, to reflect on our relationship with the planet and with each other.

So as we continue to push the boundaries of innovation, let’s not forget to ask: Are we solving problems or postponing them? And more importantly, are we building a future where humanity thrives, not just because of what we create, but because of what we’re willing to change?

‍